Lateral entry has proven to be a beneficial strategy, as it brings fresh perspectives and renewed energy to governance, driving innovation and progress
Bhaskar Parichha
The Narendra Modi government’s choice to retract an advertisement aimed at recruiting 45 mid-level specialists through the lateral entry process, in light of significant controversy, should not be viewed as an isolated event. This decision is indicative of a broader pattern of notable reversals, including the recent deferral of the Wakf Amendment Bill, which has been sent to a joint parliamentary committee, as well as the suspension of the draft Broadcast Bill for additional deliberations.
The issue of lateral entry is distinctive and carries significant implications. The announcement by the UPSC quickly ignited criticism and concerns from both the ruling coalition and external observers, as it was perceived that by categorizing the 45 positions as specialized and labeling them as single-cadre roles, the government was circumventing the established reservation system.
In light of the political backdrop of the recent general elections, where the BJP-led NDA’s setbacks have been linked to the sentiments among backward classes regarding an attempt to achieve a “400 paar” majority that could undermine the constitutional commitment to social justice, this reversal was, arguably, a politically unavoidable decision.
Good Strategy
Lateral entry into governance and public administration has proven to be a beneficial strategy, as it has historically brought in fresh perspectives and renewed energy to established systems. This approach is particularly crucial in today’s rapidly evolving political and social landscape, where the complexities of governance are increasing at an unprecedented rate.
The infusion of new talent and ideas from outside the traditional pathways can help state institutions adapt and respond more effectively to these challenges. While it is important to acknowledge that lateral entrants are not a cure-all for the systemic issues and deficiencies that may exist within governmental structures, their contributions can be significant. They can introduce innovative solutions and best practices from other sectors or fields, which can lead to improved efficiency and effectiveness in public service delivery.
Moreover, their diverse backgrounds can foster a culture of creativity and critical thinking, encouraging existing personnel to rethink established norms and practices. It is also worth noting that, despite the potential benefits of lateral entry, there are valid arguments for pursuing a more comprehensive reorganization of governmental structures. Such reorganization could address deeper systemic issues that lateral entrants alone may not be able to resolve.
Filling Gaps
In the meantime, lateral entrants can significantly contribute to filling particular gaps in knowledge and specialization. By concentrating on specific timeframes and well-defined goals, these individuals can facilitate the execution of targeted initiatives that respond to urgent needs and challenges within the governance structure.
The necessity for the recruitment of personnel at senior and middle management levels within government structures has been consistently emphasized by various bodies, including the Second Administrative Reforms Commission in 2005, the Sixth Pay Commission in 2013, and the recommendations put forth by the Niti Aayog in 2017.
In recent years, the government has expanded the breadth and depth of its lateral hiring programs. Nevertheless, difficulties arise when the definitions of “expertise” and “merit” are contrasted with the ideals of “social justice” and “equality.” It is crucial to understand that these notions do not have to be perceived as opposing; instead, they can be regarded as synergistic and reinforcing one another.
Merit vs. Reservation
The Supreme Court’s recent decision concerning sub-quotas for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) highlights the need to question the simplistic binary of merit versus reservation in a society marked by profound inequalities. Merit should be framed within the context of social values such as equality and inclusivity; the genuine conflict exists between the affluent and the disadvantaged, rather than between merit and the principles of distributive justice.
In its third term, the Modi administration, which is currently operating with a diminished majority in the legislature, must take this critical insight into account as it navigates the complexities of governance. The political landscape has shifted, and the presence of a more robust Opposition means that the government cannot afford to overlook differing perspectives and dissenting voices. It is essential for the government to actively recognize and engage with the viewpoints of this stronger Opposition, as doing so can lead to more inclusive policymaking and a deeper understanding of the diverse needs and concerns of the populace.
Collective Pressure
By fostering open lines of communication with opposition parties, the administration can not only enhance its legitimacy but also build a more collaborative political environment. Moreover, it is equally important for the Modi administration to maintain strong relationships with its allies. The coalition dynamics require that the government ensures that the opinions and interests of its partners are taken into consideration. This approach will not only strengthen the coalition but also promote a sense of shared responsibility and collective governance.
The recruitments via lateral entry faced significant pushback not only from internal allies like JD(U) and LJP but also from the agitation led by Rahul Gandhi’s Congress, which seeks to assert its influence on the caste issue. This collective pressure prompted a reconsideration of the initiative. It is imperative for the government to recognize that the evolving demographics necessitate a fresh approach to engagement. In a nation characterized by diversity, such an approach is essential for fostering improved decision-making and developing more responsive policies.
(The author is a senior journalist and columnist. Views expressed are personal.)
